competition success review against privacy in its puttaswamy judgment [2017] sc asserted that the government must carefully balance individual privacy and the legitimate concerns of the state even if national security was at stake. any invasion of privacy must satisfy tests on 3 parameters need (legitimate state aim) proportionality (least restrictive method to achieve states goals) and legality (postulated by the law) – to ensure that fair just and reasonable procedure is followed without any selective targeting and profiling. a blanket power to wide range of government agencies to access an individuals encrypted material is a clear violation of the judgement. moreover an individual can never know that she is being surveilled means that challenging it before a court is a nearimpossibility competition success review buy.
No comments:
Post a Comment